Demographics details for Covington, WA vs Waterman, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, WA vs Waterman, IL.
| Data | Covington | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,374 | 1,427 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $123,065 | $87,292 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs Waterman
- In Covington, the population is higher at 21,374, compared to 1,427 in Waterman.
- Residents in Covington have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 36.2 years in Waterman.
- Covington has a higher median income of $123,065 compared to $87,292 in Waterman.
- In Waterman, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 45.0% in Covington.
- The poverty level is higher in Waterman at 6%, compared to 5% in Covington.
- The unemployment rate in Covington is higher at 4.3%, compared to 4.1% in Waterman.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs Waterman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Covington | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 2 |
| White | 63 | 78 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Waterman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 6% compared to 2% in Waterman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waterman at 78% compared to 63% in Covington.
- The Asian population is larger in Covington at 11% compared to 1% in Waterman.
- Waterman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 9% in Covington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Covington at 11% compared to 9% in Waterman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Covington and Waterman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Covington | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 11.1% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 25.2% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Waterman
- More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.0% in Waterman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 25.6% compared to 21.6% in Waterman.
- Waterman has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 11.1% in Covington.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Covington and Waterman at 18.7%.
- Waterman has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 25.2% in Covington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Covington at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Waterman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Covington | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (130) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (2,719) | 22.6% (323) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (1,308) | 8.5% (122) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (4,703) | 15.5% (221) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Waterman
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Waterman.
- In Waterman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 12.7% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waterman at 8.5%, compared to 6.1% in Covington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 15.5% in Waterman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.