Demographics details for Covington, WA vs Torrington, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, WA vs Torrington, CT.
Data | Covington | Torrington |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,374 | 35,563 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 40.8 years |
Median Income | $123,065 | $66,616 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs Torrington
- The population in Torrington is higher at 35,563, compared to 21,374 in Covington.
- The median age in Torrington is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 38.6 years in Covington.
- Covington has a higher median income of $123,065 compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Covington at 45.0% compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
- The poverty level is higher in Torrington at 9%, compared to 5% in Covington.
- The unemployment rate in Covington is higher at 4.3%, compared to 2.8% in Torrington.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs Torrington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Covington | Torrington |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 10 |
White | 63 | 61 |
Asian | 11 | 3 |
Hispanic | 9 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Torrington
- In Torrington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 6% in Covington.
- Covington has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 61% in Torrington.
- The Asian population is larger in Covington at 11% compared to 3% in Torrington.
- Torrington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 9% in Covington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Covington at 11% compared to 9% in Torrington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Covington and Torrington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Covington | Torrington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 10.5% |
Depression | 25.6% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 11.1% | 16.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 25.2% | 28.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Torrington
- More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.2% in Torrington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 25.6% compared to 23.3% in Torrington.
- Torrington has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 11.1% in Covington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Covington at 18.7% compared to 16.6% in Torrington.
- Torrington has higher obesity rates at 28.8% compared to 25.2% in Covington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Covington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Covington | Torrington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (130) | 1.2% (425) |
High School Diploma | 12.7% (2,719) | 22.6% (8,040) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (1,308) | 16.1% (5,736) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (4,703) | 17.7% (6,279) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Torrington
- In Torrington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Covington.
- In Torrington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 12.7% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Torrington at 16.1%, compared to 6.1% in Covington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 17.7% in Torrington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.