Demographics details for Covington, WA vs Spartanburg, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, WA vs Spartanburg, SC.
| Data | Covington | Spartanburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,374 | 38,584 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $123,065 | $49,140 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs Spartanburg
- The population in Spartanburg is higher at 38,584, compared to 21,374 in Covington.
- Residents in Covington have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 35.5 years in Spartanburg.
- Covington has a higher median income of $123,065 compared to $49,140 in Spartanburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Covington at 45.0% compared to 28.0% in Spartanburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Spartanburg at 15%, compared to 5% in Covington.
- Spartanburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.3% in Covington.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs Spartanburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Covington | Spartanburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 45 |
| White | 63 | 44 |
| Asian | 11 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Spartanburg
- In Spartanburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 6% in Covington.
- Covington has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 44% in Spartanburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Covington at 11% compared to 2% in Spartanburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Covington at 9% compared to 5% in Spartanburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Covington at 11% compared to 4% in Spartanburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Covington and Spartanburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Covington | Spartanburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 11.1% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 25.2% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Spartanburg
- In Spartanburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.8% in Covington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 25.6% compared to 22.9% in Spartanburg.
- Spartanburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 11.1% in Covington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Covington at 18.7% compared to 13.8% in Spartanburg.
- Spartanburg has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 25.2% in Covington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spartanburg at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Covington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Covington | Spartanburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (130) | 1.0% (384) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (2,719) | 15.9% (6,118) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (1,308) | 11.2% (4,339) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (4,703) | 21.3% (8,205) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Spartanburg
- In Spartanburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Covington.
- In Spartanburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.9% compared to 12.7% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spartanburg at 11.2%, compared to 6.1% in Covington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 21.3% in Spartanburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.