Demographics details for Covington, WA vs San marcos, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, WA vs San marcos, CA.
Data | Covington | San marcos |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,374 | 94,854 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $123,065 | $99,413 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs San marcos
- The population in San marcos is higher at 94,854, compared to 21,374 in Covington.
- Residents in Covington have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 35.9 years in San marcos.
- Covington has a higher median income of $123,065 compared to $99,413 in San marcos.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Covington at 45.0% compared to 41.0% in San marcos.
- The poverty level is higher in San marcos at 9%, compared to 5% in Covington.
- San marcos has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.3% in Covington.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs San marcos provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Covington | San marcos |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 2 |
White | 63 | 31 |
Asian | 11 | 10 |
Hispanic | 9 | 40 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs San marcos
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 6% compared to 2% in San marcos.
- Covington has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 31% in San marcos.
- The Asian population is larger in Covington at 11% compared to 10% in San marcos.
- San marcos has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 9% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San marcos at 16%, compared to 11% in Covington.
- In San marcos, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Covington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Covington | San marcos |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 10.8% |
Depression | 25.6% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 11.1% | 11.2% |
Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 18.6% |
Obesity | 25.2% | 24.2% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs San marcos
- More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.9% in San marcos.
- Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 25.6% compared to 17.8% in San marcos.
- San marcos has a higher smoking rate at 11.2% compared to 11.1% in Covington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Covington at 18.7% compared to 18.6% in San marcos.
- Obesity rates are higher in Covington at 25.2% compared to 24.2% in San marcos.
- Disability percentages are higher in Covington at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in San marcos.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Covington | San marcos |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (130) | 1.8% (1,684) |
High School Diploma | 12.7% (2,719) | 10.1% (9,567) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (1,308) | 15.0% (14,213) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (4,703) | 26.4% (25,049) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs San marcos
- In San marcos, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Covington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a high school diploma at 12.7% compared to 10.1% in San marcos.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San marcos at 15.0%, compared to 6.1% in Covington.
- In San marcos, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 22.0% in Covington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.