Demographics details for Covington, WA vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Covington, WA vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data Covington Massapequa park
Population 21,374 16,873
Median Age 38.6 years 43.7 years
Median Income $123,065 $161,193
Married Families 45.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Covington vs Massapequa park

  • In Covington, the population is higher at 21,374, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 38.6 years in Covington.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $123,065 in Covington.
  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 45.0% in Covington.
  • Covington has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate in Covington is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics Covington vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Covington Massapequa park
Black 6 1
White 63 88
Asian 11 2
Hispanic 9 5
Two or More Races 11 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 6% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to 63% in Covington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Covington at 11% compared to 2% in Massapequa park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Covington at 9% compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Covington at 11% compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Covington and Massapequa park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Covington Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 8.0%
Depression 25.6% 17.9%
Smoking 11.1% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 19.2%
Obesity 25.2% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 25.6% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher smoking rate at 11.5% compared to 11.1% in Covington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 18.7% in Covington.
  • Massapequa park has higher obesity rates at 26.4% compared to 25.2% in Covington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Covington at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Covington Massapequa park
No Schooling 0.6% (130) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 12.7% (2,719) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 6.1% (1,308) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.0% (4,703) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Covington have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 12.7% in Covington.
  • More residents in Covington have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 22.0% in Covington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.