Demographics details for Covington, WA vs Dalhart, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, WA vs Dalhart, TX.
| Data | Covington | Dalhart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,374 | 8,402 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $123,065 | $75,000 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs Dalhart
- In Covington, the population is higher at 21,374, compared to 8,402 in Dalhart.
- Residents in Covington have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 34.7 years in Dalhart.
- Covington has a higher median income of $123,065 compared to $75,000 in Dalhart.
- In Dalhart, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 45.0% in Covington.
- The poverty level is higher in Dalhart at 12%, compared to 5% in Covington.
- The unemployment rate in Covington is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Dalhart.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs Dalhart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Covington | Dalhart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 63 | 37 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Dalhart
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 6% compared to 0% in Dalhart.
- Covington has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 37% in Dalhart.
- The Asian population is larger in Covington at 11% compared to 0% in Dalhart.
- Dalhart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 9% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dalhart at 15%, compared to 11% in Covington.
- In Dalhart, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Covington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Covington | Dalhart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 11.1% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 25.2% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Dalhart
- In Dalhart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.8% in Covington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 25.6% compared to 23.5% in Dalhart.
- Dalhart has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 11.1% in Covington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dalhart at 18.9% compared to 18.7% in Covington.
- Dalhart has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 25.2% in Covington.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Covington and Dalhart at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Covington | Dalhart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (130) | 4.1% (348) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (2,719) | 20.8% (1,750) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (1,308) | 19.2% (1,609) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (4,703) | 13.0% (1,095) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Dalhart
- In Dalhart, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 0.6% in Covington.
- In Dalhart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 12.7% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dalhart at 19.2%, compared to 6.1% in Covington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 13.0% in Dalhart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.