Demographics details for Covington, VA vs Cranston, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, VA vs Cranston, RI.
| Data | Covington | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,679 | 82,421 |
| Median Age | 41.9 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $45,737 | $83,123 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs Cranston
- The population in Cranston is higher at 82,421, compared to 5,679 in Covington.
- Residents in Covington have a higher median age of 41.9 years compared to 39.9 years in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123, compared to $45,737 in Covington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Covington at 43.0% compared to 37.0% in Cranston.
- Covington has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.1% in Covington.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs Cranston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Covington | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 5 |
| White | 79 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 14% compared to 5% in Cranston.
- Covington has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Covington.
- Cranston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cranston at 9%, compared to 4% in Covington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Covington and Cranston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Covington | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Cranston
- More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cranston at 24.9% versus 24.8% in Covington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Covington at 21.6% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 16.6% in Covington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Covington at 39.9% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Covington at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Covington | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (11) | 1.1% (930) |
| High School Diploma | 29.8% (1,691) | 16.1% (13,246) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (808) | 13.4% (11,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (455) | 24.7% (20,330) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Cranston
- In Cranston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Covington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- More residents in Covington have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 8.0% in Covington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.