Demographics details for Covington, TN vs Whitehall, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, TN vs Whitehall, PA.
| Data | Covington | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,597 | 14,785 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 44.8 years |
| Median Income | $44,384 | $77,752 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs Whitehall
- The population in Whitehall is higher at 14,785, compared to 8,597 in Covington.
- The median age in Whitehall is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 35.4 years in Covington.
- Whitehall has a higher median income of $77,752, compared to $44,384 in Covington.
- In Whitehall, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 31.0% in Covington.
- Covington has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Whitehall.
- The unemployment rate in Covington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Whitehall.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Covington | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 4 |
| White | 41 | 78 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 55% compared to 4% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Whitehall at 78% compared to 41% in Covington.
- In Whitehall, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Covington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Covington at 2% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Whitehall at 3%, compared to 2% in Covington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Covington and Whitehall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Covington | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.2% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 26.8% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 48.0% | 30.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Whitehall
- More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 22.2% compared to 15.5% in Whitehall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 28.8% compared to 22.0% in Whitehall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Covington at 26.8% compared to 17.0% in Whitehall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 21.4% compared to 12.9% in Covington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Covington at 48.0% compared to 30.9% in Whitehall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Covington at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Whitehall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Covington | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (155) | 2.0% (302) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (1,822) | 18.2% (2,688) |
| Less than High School | 14.8% (1,273) | 7.7% (1,141) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (734) | 31.1% (4,603) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Whitehall
- In Whitehall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.8% in Covington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 18.2% in Whitehall.
- More residents in Covington have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 7.7% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 8.5% in Covington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.