Demographics details for Covington, TN vs Saratoga springs, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Covington, TN vs Saratoga springs, NY.

Data Covington Saratoga springs
Population 8,597 28,593
Median Age 35.4 years 41.8 years
Median Income $44,384 $97,241
Married Families 31.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 14% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.3

Population Comparison: Covington vs Saratoga springs

  • The population in Saratoga springs is higher at 28,593, compared to 8,597 in Covington.
  • The median age in Saratoga springs is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 35.4 years in Covington.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher median income of $97,241, compared to $44,384 in Covington.
  • In Saratoga springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 31.0% in Covington.
  • Covington has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 6% in Saratoga springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Covington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.3% in Saratoga springs.

Demographics

Demographics Covington vs Saratoga springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Covington Saratoga springs
Black 55 3
White 41 86
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 2 4
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Saratoga springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 55% compared to 3% in Saratoga springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Saratoga springs at 86% compared to 41% in Covington.
  • In Saratoga springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Covington.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Covington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Saratoga springs at 4%, compared to 2% in Covington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Covington and Saratoga springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Covington Saratoga springs
Mental Health Not Good 22.2% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 16.3% 8.2%
Depression 28.8% 20.8%
Smoking 26.8% 13.2%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 21.5%
Obesity 48.0% 28.4%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Saratoga springs

  • More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 22.2% compared to 13.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 28.8% compared to 20.8% in Saratoga springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Covington at 26.8% compared to 13.2% in Saratoga springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Saratoga springs at 21.5% compared to 12.9% in Covington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Covington at 48.0% compared to 28.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Covington at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Covington Saratoga springs
No Schooling 1.8% (155) 0.7% (208)
High School Diploma 21.2% (1,822) 11.0% (3,147)
Less than High School 14.8% (1,273) 6.3% (1,801)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.5% (734) 42.3% (12,109)

Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Saratoga springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Covington have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Saratoga springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.
  • More residents in Covington have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 6.3% in Saratoga springs.
  • In Saratoga springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.3% compared to 8.5% in Covington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.