Demographics details for Covington, TN vs Panacea, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, TN vs Panacea, FL.
| Data | Covington | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,597 | 1,152 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 46.7 years |
| Median Income | $44,384 | $36,250 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs Panacea
- In Covington, the population is higher at 8,597, compared to 1,152 in Panacea.
- The median age in Panacea is higher at 46.7 years, compared to 35.4 years in Covington.
- Covington has a higher median income of $44,384 compared to $36,250 in Panacea.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Covington at 31.0% compared to 30.0% in Panacea.
- Covington has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Panacea.
- The unemployment rate in Covington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Panacea.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs Panacea provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Covington | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | Data is updating |
| White | 41 | 99 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Panacea
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 55% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Panacea at 99% compared to 41% in Covington.
- Both Covington and Panacea have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Covington at 2% compared to 0% in Panacea.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Covington at 2% compared to 1% in Panacea.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Covington and Panacea at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Covington | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.2% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 26.8% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 48.0% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 31.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Panacea
- More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 22.2% compared to 17.8% in Panacea.
- Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 28.8% compared to 22.3% in Panacea.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Covington at 26.8% compared to 23.5% in Panacea.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Panacea at 17.4% compared to 12.9% in Covington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Covington at 48.0% compared to 32.3% in Panacea.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Panacea at 31.0% compared to 18.0% in Covington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Covington | Panacea |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (155) | 4.1% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (1,822) | 32.5% (374) |
| Less than High School | 14.8% (1,273) | 55.4% (638) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (734) | 11.9% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Panacea
- In Panacea, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 1.8% in Covington.
- In Panacea, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.5% compared to 21.2% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Panacea at 55.4%, compared to 14.8% in Covington.
- In Panacea, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 8.5% in Covington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.