Demographics details for Covington, TN vs Little rock, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, TN vs Little rock, AR.
Data | Covington | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,597 | 202,864 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $44,384 | $58,697 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs Little rock
- The population in Little rock is higher at 202,864, compared to 8,597 in Covington.
- The median age in Little rock is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 35.4 years in Covington.
- Little rock has a higher median income of $58,697, compared to $44,384 in Covington.
- In Little rock, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 31.0% in Covington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Covington and Little rock at 14%.
- The unemployment rate in Covington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.7% in Little rock.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs Little rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Covington | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Black | 55 | 41 |
White | 41 | 44 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 2 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Little rock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 55% compared to 41% in Little rock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Little rock at 44% compared to 41% in Covington.
- In Little rock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Covington.
- Little rock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Little rock at 4%, compared to 2% in Covington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Covington and Little rock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Covington | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.2% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 12.0% |
Depression | 28.8% | 21.9% |
Smoking | 26.8% | 19.0% |
Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 48.0% | 39.0% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Little rock
- More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 22.2% compared to 16.9% in Little rock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 28.8% compared to 21.9% in Little rock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Covington at 26.8% compared to 19.0% in Little rock.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Covington and Little rock at 12.9%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Covington at 48.0% compared to 39.0% in Little rock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Covington at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Little rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Covington | Little rock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (155) | 0.7% (1,359) |
High School Diploma | 21.2% (1,822) | 12.2% (24,667) |
Less than High School | 14.8% (1,273) | 7.3% (14,766) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (734) | 29.4% (59,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Little rock
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Little rock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 12.2% in Little rock.
- More residents in Covington have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 7.3% in Little rock.
- In Little rock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 8.5% in Covington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.