Demographics details for Covington, TN vs Freeport, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, TN vs Freeport, IL.
| Data | Covington | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,597 | 23,413 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 43.4 years |
| Median Income | $44,384 | $44,658 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs Freeport
- The population in Freeport is higher at 23,413, compared to 8,597 in Covington.
- The median age in Freeport is higher at 43.4 years, compared to 35.4 years in Covington.
- Freeport has a higher median income of $44,658, compared to $44,384 in Covington.
- In Freeport, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Covington.
- Covington has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 5.2% in Covington.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs Freeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Covington | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 14 |
| White | 41 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Freeport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 55% compared to 14% in Freeport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Freeport at 68% compared to 41% in Covington.
- In Freeport, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Covington.
- Freeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Freeport at 10%, compared to 2% in Covington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Covington and Freeport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Covington | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.2% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 26.8% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 48.0% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Freeport
- More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 22.2% compared to 18.0% in Freeport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 28.8% compared to 22.3% in Freeport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Covington at 26.8% compared to 20.6% in Freeport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeport at 15.9% compared to 12.9% in Covington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Covington at 48.0% compared to 40.8% in Freeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Freeport at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Covington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Covington | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (155) | 0.9% (206) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (1,822) | 19.8% (4,646) |
| Less than High School | 14.8% (1,273) | 12.2% (2,845) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (734) | 12.9% (3,011) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Freeport
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.9% in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 19.8% in Freeport.
- More residents in Covington have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 12.2% in Freeport.
- In Freeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 8.5% in Covington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.