Demographics details for Covington, TN vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covington, TN vs Central city, KY.
Data | Covington | Central city |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,597 | 5,810 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 33.5 years |
Median Income | $44,384 | $52,184 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Covington vs Central city
- In Covington, the population is higher at 8,597, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- Residents in Covington have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $52,184, compared to $44,384 in Covington.
- In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Covington.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 14% in Covington.
- The unemployment rate in Covington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Covington vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Covington | Central city |
---|---|---|
Black | 55 | 3 |
White | 41 | 88 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Covington vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Covington at 55% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 41% in Covington.
- Both Covington and Central city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Covington and Central city at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central city at 6%, compared to 2% in Covington.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Covington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Covington | Central city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.2% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.5% |
Depression | 28.8% | 26.8% |
Smoking | 26.8% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 48.0% | 41.9% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covington vs Central city
- More residents in Covington report poor mental health at 22.2% compared to 19.3% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Covington at 28.8% compared to 26.8% in Central city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Covington at 26.8% compared to 24.8% in Central city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central city at 14.8% compared to 12.9% in Covington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Covington at 48.0% compared to 41.9% in Central city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Covington at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Covington | Central city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (155) | 1.1% (65) |
High School Diploma | 21.2% (1,822) | 15.4% (897) |
Less than High School | 14.8% (1,273) | 15.6% (905) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (734) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covington vs Central city
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.1% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 14.8% in Covington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.5% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.