Demographics details for Covina, CA vs Spotsylvania, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covina, CA vs Spotsylvania, VA.
| Data | Covina | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,489 | 146,688 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $89,650 | $105,068 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Covina vs Spotsylvania
- The population in Spotsylvania is higher at 146,688, compared to 49,489 in Covina.
- The median age in Spotsylvania is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 37.6 years in Covina.
- Spotsylvania has a higher median income of $105,068, compared to $89,650 in Covina.
- In Spotsylvania, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Covina.
- Covina has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Spotsylvania.
- The unemployment rate in Covina is higher at 6.0%, compared to 3.2% in Spotsylvania.
Demographics
Demographics Covina vs Spotsylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Covina | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 16 |
| White | 18 | 63 |
| Asian | 14 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 63 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Covina vs Spotsylvania
- In Spotsylvania, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 4% in Covina.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spotsylvania at 63% compared to 18% in Covina.
- The Asian population is larger in Covina at 14% compared to 3% in Spotsylvania.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Covina at 63% compared to 11% in Spotsylvania.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Covina at 19% compared to 7% in Spotsylvania.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Covina at 1% compared to 0% in Spotsylvania.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Covina | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 15.9% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 10.5% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covina vs Spotsylvania
- In Spotsylvania, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 15.1% in Covina.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spotsylvania at 21.8% versus 15.9% in Covina.
- Spotsylvania has a higher smoking rate at 13.7% compared to 10.5% in Covina.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spotsylvania at 17.1% compared to 15.6% in Covina.
- Spotsylvania has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 28.2% in Covina.
- Disability percentages are higher in Covina at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Spotsylvania.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Covina | Spotsylvania |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (753) | 0.9% (1,297) |
| High School Diploma | 17.4% (8,620) | 15.5% (22,702) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (8,533) | 10.2% (14,913) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (9,254) | 21.4% (31,461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covina vs Spotsylvania
- A higher percentage of residents in Covina have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.9% in Spotsylvania.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covina hold a high school diploma at 17.4% compared to 15.5% in Spotsylvania.
- More residents in Covina have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 10.2% in Spotsylvania.
- In Spotsylvania, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 18.7% in Covina.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.