Demographics details for Covina, CA vs Laurinburg, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Covina, CA vs Laurinburg, NC.
Data | Covina | Laurinburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 49,489 | 14,908 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 38.1 years |
Median Income | $89,650 | $38,015 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Covina vs Laurinburg
- In Covina, the population is higher at 49,489, compared to 14,908 in Laurinburg.
- The median age in Laurinburg is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 37.6 years in Covina.
- Covina has a higher median income of $89,650 compared to $38,015 in Laurinburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Covina at 38.0% compared to 27.0% in Laurinburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurinburg at 21%, compared to 12% in Covina.
- The unemployment rate in Covina is higher at 6.0%, compared to 5.2% in Laurinburg.
Demographics
Demographics Covina vs Laurinburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Covina | Laurinburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 49 |
White | 18 | 32 |
Asian | 14 | 1 |
Hispanic | 63 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 19 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Covina vs Laurinburg
- In Laurinburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 4% in Covina.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurinburg at 32% compared to 18% in Covina.
- The Asian population is larger in Covina at 14% compared to 1% in Laurinburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Covina at 63% compared to 5% in Laurinburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Covina at 19% compared to 6% in Laurinburg.
- In Laurinburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 1% in Covina.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Covina | Laurinburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 14.7% |
Depression | 15.9% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 10.5% | 23.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 14.0% |
Obesity | 28.2% | 44.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Covina vs Laurinburg
- In Laurinburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.1% in Covina.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurinburg at 23.8% versus 15.9% in Covina.
- Laurinburg has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 10.5% in Covina.
- Binge drinking is more common in Covina at 15.6% compared to 14.0% in Laurinburg.
- Laurinburg has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 28.2% in Covina.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurinburg at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Covina.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Covina | Laurinburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (753) | 0.5% (75) |
High School Diploma | 17.4% (8,620) | 18.8% (2,799) |
Less than High School | 17.2% (8,533) | 13.6% (2,024) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (9,254) | 12.2% (1,826) |
Education Levels Comparison: Covina vs Laurinburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Covina have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Laurinburg.
- In Laurinburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 17.4% in Covina.
- More residents in Covina have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 13.6% in Laurinburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Covina hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 12.2% in Laurinburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.