Demographics details for Cottonwood, ID vs Fort lupton, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cottonwood, ID vs Fort lupton, CO.

Data Cottonwood Fort lupton
Population 876 8,829
Median Age 33.1 years 35.9 years
Median Income $55,147 $71,293
Married Families 56.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Cottonwood vs Fort lupton

  • The population in Fort lupton is higher at 8,829, compared to 876 in Cottonwood.
  • The median age in Fort lupton is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 33.1 years in Cottonwood.
  • Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $55,147 in Cottonwood.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cottonwood at 56.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort lupton at 10%, compared to 0% in Cottonwood.
  • Fort lupton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Cottonwood.

Demographics

Demographics Cottonwood vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cottonwood Fort lupton
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 92 26
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 53
Two or More Races 6 20
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Fort lupton

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cottonwood and Fort lupton at 0%.
  • Cottonwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
  • Both Cottonwood and Fort lupton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 1% in Cottonwood.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 6% in Cottonwood.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cottonwood and Fort lupton at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cottonwood Fort lupton
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 11.8%
Depression 22.3% 19.9%
Smoking 17.8% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 17.0%
Obesity 31.2% 30.2%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Fort lupton

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Cottonwood and Fort lupton at 15.8%.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 22.3% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 17.8% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Cottonwood.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cottonwood at 31.2% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cottonwood at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cottonwood Fort lupton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.6% (145)
High School Diploma 28.3% (248) 16.2% (1,428)
Less than High School 19.6% (172) 28.0% (2,476)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.2% (177) 7.0% (622)

Education Levels Comparison: Cottonwood vs Fort lupton

  • In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Cottonwood.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 19.6% in Cottonwood.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.