Demographics details for Cottonwood, ID vs Fort lupton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cottonwood, ID vs Fort lupton, CO.
Data | Cottonwood | Fort lupton |
---|---|---|
Population | 876 | 8,829 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $55,147 | $71,293 |
Married Families | 56.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cottonwood vs Fort lupton
- The population in Fort lupton is higher at 8,829, compared to 876 in Cottonwood.
- The median age in Fort lupton is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 33.1 years in Cottonwood.
- Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $55,147 in Cottonwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cottonwood at 56.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort lupton at 10%, compared to 0% in Cottonwood.
- Fort lupton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Cottonwood.
Demographics
Demographics Cottonwood vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cottonwood | Fort lupton |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 92 | 26 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 53 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 20 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Fort lupton
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cottonwood and Fort lupton at 0%.
- Cottonwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- Both Cottonwood and Fort lupton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 1% in Cottonwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 6% in Cottonwood.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cottonwood and Fort lupton at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cottonwood | Fort lupton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 11.8% |
Depression | 22.3% | 19.9% |
Smoking | 17.8% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 31.2% | 30.2% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Fort lupton
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Cottonwood and Fort lupton at 15.8%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 22.3% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 17.8% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Cottonwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cottonwood at 31.2% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cottonwood at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cottonwood | Fort lupton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (145) |
High School Diploma | 28.3% (248) | 16.2% (1,428) |
Less than High School | 19.6% (172) | 28.0% (2,476) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (177) | 7.0% (622) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cottonwood vs Fort lupton
- In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Cottonwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 19.6% in Cottonwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.