Demographics details for Cottonwood, AL vs Shrub oak, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cottonwood, AL vs Shrub oak, NY.
| Data | Cottonwood | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,057 | 3,002 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $31,591 | $128,832 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cottonwood vs Shrub oak
- The population in Shrub oak is higher at 3,002, compared to 1,057 in Cottonwood.
- Residents in Cottonwood have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 36.6 years in Shrub oak.
- Shrub oak has a higher median income of $128,832, compared to $31,591 in Cottonwood.
- In Shrub oak, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Cottonwood.
- Cottonwood has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Shrub oak.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cottonwood and Shrub oak at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Cottonwood vs Shrub oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cottonwood | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 37 | 2 |
| White | 57 | 64 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 15 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cottonwood at 37% compared to 2% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shrub oak at 64% compared to 57% in Cottonwood.
- In Shrub oak, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 0% in Cottonwood.
- Shrub oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 0% in Cottonwood.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cottonwood at 4% compared to 1% in Shrub oak.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cottonwood at 2% compared to 0% in Shrub oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cottonwood | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 25.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Shrub oak
- More residents in Cottonwood report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 13.2% in Shrub oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 26.3% compared to 19.7% in Shrub oak.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 22.7% compared to 11.3% in Shrub oak.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shrub oak at 18.1% compared to 14.5% in Cottonwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cottonwood at 40.8% compared to 25.7% in Shrub oak.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cottonwood at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cottonwood | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.4% (36) | 0.4% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 29.8% (315) | 11.0% (330) |
| Less than High School | 28.8% (304) | 12.9% (387) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (97) | 38.9% (1,168) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cottonwood vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood have no formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.4% in Shrub oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
- More residents in Cottonwood have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 12.9% in Shrub oak.
- In Shrub oak, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 9.2% in Cottonwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.