Demographics details for Cottonwood, AL vs Moorpark, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cottonwood, AL vs Moorpark, CA.
| Data | Cottonwood | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,057 | 35,514 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $31,591 | $143,218 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Cottonwood vs Moorpark
- The population in Moorpark is higher at 35,514, compared to 1,057 in Cottonwood.
- Residents in Cottonwood have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 38.8 years in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218, compared to $31,591 in Cottonwood.
- In Moorpark, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 35.0% in Cottonwood.
- Cottonwood has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Cottonwood.
Demographics
Demographics Cottonwood vs Moorpark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cottonwood | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 37 | 3 |
| White | 57 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 17 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Moorpark
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cottonwood at 37% compared to 3% in Moorpark.
- Cottonwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 38% in Moorpark.
- In Moorpark, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Cottonwood.
- Moorpark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 0% in Cottonwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moorpark at 17%, compared to 4% in Cottonwood.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cottonwood at 2% compared to 1% in Moorpark.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cottonwood | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 9.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 24.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Moorpark
- More residents in Cottonwood report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 26.3% compared to 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 22.7% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moorpark at 17.8% compared to 14.5% in Cottonwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cottonwood at 40.8% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cottonwood at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Moorpark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cottonwood | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.4% (36) | 0.8% (300) |
| High School Diploma | 29.8% (315) | 9.3% (3,304) |
| Less than High School | 28.8% (304) | 11.8% (4,201) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (97) | 30.1% (10,699) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cottonwood vs Moorpark
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood have no formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.8% in Moorpark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
- More residents in Cottonwood have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 11.8% in Moorpark.
- In Moorpark, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 9.2% in Cottonwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.