Demographics details for Cottonwood, AL vs Chicago, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cottonwood, AL vs Chicago, IL.
| Data | Cottonwood | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,057 | 2,665,039 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $31,591 | $71,673 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Cottonwood vs Chicago
- The population in Chicago is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 1,057 in Cottonwood.
- Residents in Cottonwood have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher median income of $71,673, compared to $31,591 in Cottonwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cottonwood at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- The poverty level is higher in Chicago at 18%, compared to 10% in Cottonwood.
- Chicago has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 3.5% in Cottonwood.
Demographics
Demographics Cottonwood vs Chicago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cottonwood | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 37 | 29 |
| White | 57 | 23 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Chicago
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cottonwood at 37% compared to 29% in Chicago.
- Cottonwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Cottonwood.
- Chicago has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 0% in Cottonwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chicago at 10%, compared to 4% in Cottonwood.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cottonwood at 2% compared to 1% in Chicago.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cottonwood | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Chicago
- More residents in Cottonwood report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 26.3% compared to 16.3% in Chicago.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 22.7% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chicago at 16.5% compared to 14.5% in Cottonwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cottonwood at 40.8% compared to 34.1% in Chicago.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cottonwood at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Chicago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cottonwood | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.4% (36) | 1.7% (44,697) |
| High School Diploma | 29.8% (315) | 13.3% (354,780) |
| Less than High School | 28.8% (304) | 15.8% (419,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (97) | 30.4% (811,024) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cottonwood vs Chicago
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood have no formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 1.7% in Chicago.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- More residents in Cottonwood have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 15.8% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 9.2% in Cottonwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.