Demographics details for Cottonwood, AL vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cottonwood, AL vs Beaver dam, WI.
| Data | Cottonwood | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,057 | 16,582 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $31,591 | $65,802 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Cottonwood vs Beaver dam
- The population in Beaver dam is higher at 16,582, compared to 1,057 in Cottonwood.
- Residents in Cottonwood have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802, compared to $31,591 in Cottonwood.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Cottonwood and Beaver dam at 35.0%.
- Cottonwood has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate in Cottonwood is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Cottonwood vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cottonwood | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 37 | 3 |
| White | 57 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cottonwood at 37% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 57% in Cottonwood.
- In Beaver dam, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cottonwood.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Cottonwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaver dam at 6%, compared to 4% in Cottonwood.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cottonwood at 2% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cottonwood | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cottonwood vs Beaver dam
- More residents in Cottonwood report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 26.3% compared to 23.6% in Beaver dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cottonwood at 22.7% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 14.5% in Cottonwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cottonwood at 40.8% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cottonwood at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cottonwood | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.4% (36) | 0.3% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 29.8% (315) | 23.8% (3,947) |
| Less than High School | 28.8% (304) | 10.3% (1,706) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (97) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cottonwood vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood have no formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottonwood hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 23.8% in Beaver dam.
- More residents in Cottonwood have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 9.2% in Cottonwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.