Demographics details for Cottondale, AL vs Keizer, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cottondale, AL vs Keizer, OR.
| Data | Cottondale | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,211 | 38,704 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $54,688 | $75,753 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Cottondale vs Keizer
- The population in Keizer is higher at 38,704, compared to 3,211 in Cottondale.
- Residents in Cottondale have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 35.8 years in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753, compared to $54,688 in Cottondale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cottondale at 49.0% compared to 38.0% in Keizer.
- The poverty level is identical in both Cottondale and Keizer at 10%.
- Keizer has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Cottondale.
Demographics
Demographics Cottondale vs Keizer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cottondale | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 48 | 1 |
| White | 44 | 58 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cottondale vs Keizer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cottondale at 48% compared to 1% in Keizer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keizer at 58% compared to 44% in Cottondale.
- In Keizer, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Cottondale.
- Keizer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 5% in Cottondale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keizer at 14%, compared to 3% in Cottondale.
- In Keizer, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cottondale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cottondale | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 42.4% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cottondale vs Keizer
- More residents in Cottondale report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.9% in Keizer.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keizer at 28.5% versus 23.1% in Cottondale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cottondale at 19.9% compared to 15.4% in Keizer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Keizer at 16.5% compared to 15.9% in Cottondale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cottondale at 42.4% compared to 35.7% in Keizer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cottondale at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Keizer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cottondale | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (685) |
| High School Diploma | 23.6% (757) | 12.7% (4,898) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (418) | 13.9% (5,363) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (272) | 17.1% (6,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cottondale vs Keizer
- In Keizer, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Cottondale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cottondale hold a high school diploma at 23.6% compared to 12.7% in Keizer.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keizer at 13.9%, compared to 13.0% in Cottondale.
- In Keizer, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 8.5% in Cottondale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.