Demographics details for Costa mesa, CA vs Omaha, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Costa mesa, CA vs Omaha, AR.
Data | Costa mesa | Omaha |
---|---|---|
Population | 109,521 | 132 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 32.6 years |
Median Income | $104,981 | $30,938 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Costa mesa vs Omaha
- In Costa mesa, the population is higher at 109,521, compared to 132 in Omaha.
- Residents in Costa mesa have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 32.6 years in Omaha.
- Costa mesa has a higher median income of $104,981 compared to $30,938 in Omaha.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Costa mesa at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Omaha.
- The poverty level is higher in Omaha at 15%, compared to 9% in Costa mesa.
- Omaha has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Costa mesa.
Demographics
Demographics Costa mesa vs Omaha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Costa mesa | Omaha |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 40 | 73 |
Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 37 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 17 |
American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Costa mesa vs Omaha
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Costa mesa and Omaha at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Omaha at 73% compared to 40% in Costa mesa.
- The Asian population is larger in Costa mesa at 9% compared to 0% in Omaha.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Costa mesa at 37% compared to 7% in Omaha.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Omaha at 17%, compared to 12% in Costa mesa.
- In Omaha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Costa mesa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Costa mesa | Omaha |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 12.9% |
Depression | 18.5% | 27.0% |
Smoking | 10.9% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 27.6% | 38.2% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Costa mesa vs Omaha
- In Omaha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.2% in Costa mesa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Omaha at 27.0% versus 18.5% in Costa mesa.
- Omaha has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 10.9% in Costa mesa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Costa mesa at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Omaha.
- Omaha has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 27.6% in Costa mesa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Omaha at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Costa mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Costa mesa | Omaha |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (2,006) | 7.6% (10) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (12,406) | 16.7% (22) |
Less than High School | 17.3% (18,969) | 17.4% (23) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.2% (34,140) | 5.3% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Costa mesa vs Omaha
- In Omaha, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 7.6% compared to 1.8% in Costa mesa.
- In Omaha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 11.3% in Costa mesa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Omaha at 17.4%, compared to 17.3% in Costa mesa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Costa mesa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 5.3% in Omaha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.