Demographics details for Costa mesa, CA vs Kirkland, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Costa mesa, CA vs Kirkland, IL.
Data | Costa mesa | Kirkland |
---|---|---|
Population | 109,521 | 1,631 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 34.8 years |
Median Income | $104,981 | $86,950 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Costa mesa vs Kirkland
- In Costa mesa, the population is higher at 109,521, compared to 1,631 in Kirkland.
- Residents in Costa mesa have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 34.8 years in Kirkland.
- Costa mesa has a higher median income of $104,981 compared to $86,950 in Kirkland.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Costa mesa and Kirkland at 36.0%.
- Costa mesa has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Kirkland.
- Kirkland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in Costa mesa.
Demographics
Demographics Costa mesa vs Kirkland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Costa mesa | Kirkland |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 40 | 89 |
Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 37 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Costa mesa vs Kirkland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Costa mesa at 1% compared to 0% in Kirkland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kirkland at 89% compared to 40% in Costa mesa.
- The Asian population is larger in Costa mesa at 9% compared to 0% in Kirkland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Costa mesa at 37% compared to 6% in Kirkland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Costa mesa at 12% compared to 5% in Kirkland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Costa mesa at 1% compared to 0% in Kirkland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Costa mesa | Kirkland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.5% |
Depression | 18.5% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 10.9% | 16.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 27.6% | 36.2% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Costa mesa vs Kirkland
- In Kirkland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.2% in Costa mesa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kirkland at 21.8% versus 18.5% in Costa mesa.
- Kirkland has a higher smoking rate at 16.3% compared to 10.9% in Costa mesa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kirkland at 18.8% compared to 17.1% in Costa mesa.
- Kirkland has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 27.6% in Costa mesa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kirkland at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Costa mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Costa mesa | Kirkland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (2,006) | 0.3% (5) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (12,406) | 12.5% (204) |
Less than High School | 17.3% (18,969) | 11.4% (186) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.2% (34,140) | 12.4% (203) |
Education Levels Comparison: Costa mesa vs Kirkland
- A higher percentage of residents in Costa mesa have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.3% in Kirkland.
- In Kirkland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.5% compared to 11.3% in Costa mesa.
- More residents in Costa mesa have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 11.4% in Kirkland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Costa mesa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 12.4% in Kirkland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.