Demographics details for Cosmopolis, WA vs Waterman, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cosmopolis, WA vs Waterman, IL.
| Data | Cosmopolis | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,667 | 1,427 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $69,625 | $87,292 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Cosmopolis vs Waterman
- In Cosmopolis, the population is higher at 1,667, compared to 1,427 in Waterman.
- Residents in Cosmopolis have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 36.2 years in Waterman.
- Waterman has a higher median income of $87,292, compared to $69,625 in Cosmopolis.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cosmopolis at 58.0% compared to 50.0% in Waterman.
- Cosmopolis has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Waterman.
- The unemployment rate in Cosmopolis is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.1% in Waterman.
Demographics
Demographics Cosmopolis vs Waterman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cosmopolis | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 62 | 78 |
| Asian | 9 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cosmopolis vs Waterman
- In Waterman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Cosmopolis.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waterman at 78% compared to 62% in Cosmopolis.
- The Asian population is larger in Cosmopolis at 9% compared to 1% in Waterman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cosmopolis at 13% compared to 10% in Waterman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cosmopolis at 15% compared to 9% in Waterman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cosmopolis at 1% compared to 0% in Waterman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cosmopolis | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 30.6% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cosmopolis vs Waterman
- More residents in Cosmopolis report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.0% in Waterman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cosmopolis at 30.6% compared to 21.6% in Waterman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cosmopolis at 20.1% compared to 16.2% in Waterman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Waterman at 18.7% compared to 16.1% in Cosmopolis.
- Waterman has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 35.3% in Cosmopolis.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cosmopolis at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Waterman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cosmopolis | Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (384) | 22.6% (323) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (258) | 8.5% (122) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (276) | 15.5% (221) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cosmopolis vs Waterman
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cosmopolis and Waterman at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cosmopolis hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 22.6% in Waterman.
- More residents in Cosmopolis have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 8.5% in Waterman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cosmopolis hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 15.5% in Waterman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.