Demographics details for Cosmopolis, WA vs Palos park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cosmopolis, WA vs Palos park, IL.
| Data | Cosmopolis | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,667 | 4,792 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 59.5 years |
| Median Income | $69,625 | $128,370 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Cosmopolis vs Palos park
- The population in Palos park is higher at 4,792, compared to 1,667 in Cosmopolis.
- The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 40.2 years in Cosmopolis.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370, compared to $69,625 in Cosmopolis.
- In Palos park, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 58.0% in Cosmopolis.
- Cosmopolis has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Palos park.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cosmopolis and Palos park at 5.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Cosmopolis vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cosmopolis | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 62 | 88 |
| Asian | 9 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cosmopolis vs Palos park
- In Palos park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Cosmopolis.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Palos park at 88% compared to 62% in Cosmopolis.
- The Asian population is larger in Cosmopolis at 9% compared to 1% in Palos park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cosmopolis at 13% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cosmopolis at 15% compared to 5% in Palos park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cosmopolis at 1% compared to 0% in Palos park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cosmopolis | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 30.6% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 26.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cosmopolis vs Palos park
- More residents in Cosmopolis report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cosmopolis at 30.6% compared to 18.5% in Palos park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cosmopolis at 20.1% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 16.1% in Cosmopolis.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cosmopolis at 35.3% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cosmopolis at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cosmopolis | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (384) | 18.2% (870) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (258) | 6.0% (287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (276) | 42.1% (2,018) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cosmopolis vs Palos park
- In Palos park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Cosmopolis.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cosmopolis hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 18.2% in Palos park.
- More residents in Cosmopolis have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 16.6% in Cosmopolis.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.