Demographics details for Corydon, IN vs Keizer, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corydon, IN vs Keizer, OR.
| Data | Corydon | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,164 | 38,704 |
| Median Age | 41.7 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $54,125 | $75,753 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Corydon vs Keizer
- The population in Keizer is higher at 38,704, compared to 3,164 in Corydon.
- Residents in Corydon have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 35.8 years in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753, compared to $54,125 in Corydon.
- In Keizer, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Corydon.
- Corydon has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Corydon.
Demographics
Demographics Corydon vs Keizer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corydon | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 90 | 58 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Corydon vs Keizer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Corydon at 3% compared to 1% in Keizer.
- Corydon has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 58% in Keizer.
- In Keizer, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Corydon.
- Keizer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 6% in Corydon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keizer at 14%, compared to 1% in Corydon.
- In Keizer, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Corydon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corydon | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corydon vs Keizer
- In Keizer, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.7% in Corydon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keizer at 28.5% versus 25.8% in Corydon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Corydon at 20.2% compared to 15.4% in Keizer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corydon at 17.8% compared to 16.5% in Keizer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Corydon at 37.9% compared to 35.7% in Keizer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Corydon at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in Keizer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corydon | Keizer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (78) | 1.8% (685) |
| High School Diploma | 27.4% (867) | 12.7% (4,898) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (455) | 13.9% (5,363) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.7% (464) | 17.1% (6,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corydon vs Keizer
- A higher percentage of residents in Corydon have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.8% in Keizer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corydon hold a high school diploma at 27.4% compared to 12.7% in Keizer.
- More residents in Corydon have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 13.9% in Keizer.
- In Keizer, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Corydon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.