Demographics details for Corwith, IA vs Stewart, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corwith, IA vs Stewart, MN.
Data | Corwith | Stewart |
---|---|---|
Population | 265 | 474 |
Median Age | 48.9 years | 36.9 years |
Median Income | $48,125 | $52,813 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Corwith vs Stewart
- The population in Stewart is higher at 474, compared to 265 in Corwith.
- Residents in Corwith have a higher median age of 48.9 years compared to 36.9 years in Stewart.
- Stewart has a higher median income of $52,813, compared to $48,125 in Corwith.
- In Stewart, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 37.0% in Corwith.
- The poverty level is identical in both Corwith and Stewart at 0%.
- Stewart has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.3% in Corwith.
Demographics
Demographics Corwith vs Stewart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Corwith | Stewart |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 94 | 70 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corwith vs Stewart
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Corwith and Stewart at 0%.
- Corwith has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 70% in Stewart.
- Both Corwith and Stewart have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Stewart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 1% in Corwith.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stewart at 6%, compared to 5% in Corwith.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Corwith and Stewart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Corwith | Stewart |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 9.6% |
Depression | 18.7% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 18.8% | 19.3% |
Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 20.3% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corwith vs Stewart
- More residents in Corwith report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.1% in Stewart.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stewart at 23.1% versus 18.7% in Corwith.
- Stewart has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 18.8% in Corwith.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corwith at 22.1% compared to 20.3% in Stewart.
- Stewart has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 36.8% in Corwith.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Corwith and Stewart at 20.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Corwith | Stewart |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (7) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 26.8% (71) | 30.8% (146) |
Less than High School | 22.3% (59) | 13.1% (62) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (21) | 2.5% (12) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corwith vs Stewart
- A higher percentage of residents in Corwith have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.0% in Stewart.
- In Stewart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.8% compared to 26.8% in Corwith.
- More residents in Corwith have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 13.1% in Stewart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corwith hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.9% compared to 2.5% in Stewart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.