Demographics details for Corwith, IA vs Shafter, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corwith, IA vs Shafter, CA.
| Data | Corwith | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 265 | 21,282 |
| Median Age | 48.9 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $48,125 | $66,418 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Corwith vs Shafter
- The population in Shafter is higher at 21,282, compared to 265 in Corwith.
- Residents in Corwith have a higher median age of 48.9 years compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher median income of $66,418, compared to $48,125 in Corwith.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Corwith at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Shafter.
- The poverty level is higher in Shafter at 20%, compared to 0% in Corwith.
- Shafter has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.3% in Corwith.
Demographics
Demographics Corwith vs Shafter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corwith | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 94 | -9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 27 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Corwith vs Shafter
- In Shafter, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Corwith.
- Corwith has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- In Shafter, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Corwith.
- Shafter has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 1% in Corwith.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shafter at 27%, compared to 5% in Corwith.
- In Shafter, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Corwith.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corwith | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corwith vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.6% in Corwith.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shafter at 19.7% versus 18.7% in Corwith.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Corwith at 18.8% compared to 18.3% in Shafter.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corwith at 22.1% compared to 14.9% in Shafter.
- Shafter has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 36.8% in Corwith.
- Disability percentages are higher in Corwith at 20.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corwith | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (7) | 2.7% (567) |
| High School Diploma | 26.8% (71) | 14.1% (2,992) |
| Less than High School | 22.3% (59) | 32.9% (6,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (21) | 5.7% (1,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corwith vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 2.6% in Corwith.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corwith hold a high school diploma at 26.8% compared to 14.1% in Shafter.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shafter at 32.9%, compared to 22.3% in Corwith.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corwith hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.9% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.