Demographics details for Corwith, IA vs Monroe, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corwith, IA vs Monroe, MI.
| Data | Corwith | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 265 | 20,295 |
| Median Age | 48.9 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $48,125 | $57,779 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Corwith vs Monroe
- The population in Monroe is higher at 20,295, compared to 265 in Corwith.
- Residents in Corwith have a higher median age of 48.9 years compared to 36.6 years in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher median income of $57,779, compared to $48,125 in Corwith.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Corwith at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Monroe.
- The poverty level is higher in Monroe at 12%, compared to 0% in Corwith.
- Monroe has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 2.3% in Corwith.
Demographics
Demographics Corwith vs Monroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corwith | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 94 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corwith vs Monroe
- In Monroe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Corwith.
- Corwith has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 86% in Monroe.
- In Monroe, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Corwith.
- Monroe has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Corwith.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corwith at 5% compared to 4% in Monroe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Corwith and Monroe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corwith | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corwith vs Monroe
- In Monroe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.6% in Corwith.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Monroe at 25.7% versus 18.7% in Corwith.
- Monroe has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 18.8% in Corwith.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corwith at 22.1% compared to 17.5% in Monroe.
- Monroe has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 36.8% in Corwith.
- Disability percentages are higher in Corwith at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Monroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corwith | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (7) | 0.5% (105) |
| High School Diploma | 26.8% (71) | 17.0% (3,449) |
| Less than High School | 22.3% (59) | 13.0% (2,633) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (21) | 13.2% (2,681) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corwith vs Monroe
- A higher percentage of residents in Corwith have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.5% in Monroe.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corwith hold a high school diploma at 26.8% compared to 17.0% in Monroe.
- More residents in Corwith have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 13.0% in Monroe.
- In Monroe, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 7.9% in Corwith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.