Demographics details for Corwith, IA vs Marshall, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corwith, IA vs Marshall, MI.
| Data | Corwith | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 265 | 6,753 |
| Median Age | 48.9 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $48,125 | $72,813 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Corwith vs Marshall
- The population in Marshall is higher at 6,753, compared to 265 in Corwith.
- Residents in Corwith have a higher median age of 48.9 years compared to 45.4 years in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $72,813, compared to $48,125 in Corwith.
- In Marshall, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 37.0% in Corwith.
- The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 9%, compared to 0% in Corwith.
- Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.3% in Corwith.
Demographics
Demographics Corwith vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corwith | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corwith vs Marshall
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Corwith and Marshall at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Corwith and Marshall at 94%.
- Both Corwith and Marshall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Corwith.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corwith at 5% compared to 2% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Corwith and Marshall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corwith | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corwith vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.6% in Corwith.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Marshall at 25.2% versus 18.7% in Corwith.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Corwith at 18.8% compared to 17.3% in Marshall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corwith at 22.1% compared to 18.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 36.8% in Corwith.
- Disability percentages are higher in Corwith at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corwith | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (7) | 0.7% (46) |
| High School Diploma | 26.8% (71) | 15.8% (1,067) |
| Less than High School | 22.3% (59) | 7.3% (493) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (21) | 33.1% (2,233) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corwith vs Marshall
- A higher percentage of residents in Corwith have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.7% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corwith hold a high school diploma at 26.8% compared to 15.8% in Marshall.
- More residents in Corwith have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 7.3% in Marshall.
- In Marshall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 7.9% in Corwith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.