Demographics details for Corwith, IA vs Hattiesburg, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corwith, IA vs Hattiesburg, MS.
| Data | Corwith | Hattiesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 265 | 48,455 |
| Median Age | 48.9 years | 28.5 years |
| Median Income | $48,125 | $41,024 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Corwith vs Hattiesburg
- The population in Hattiesburg is higher at 48,455, compared to 265 in Corwith.
- Residents in Corwith have a higher median age of 48.9 years compared to 28.5 years in Hattiesburg.
- Corwith has a higher median income of $48,125 compared to $41,024 in Hattiesburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Corwith at 37.0% compared to 23.0% in Hattiesburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Hattiesburg at 23%, compared to 0% in Corwith.
- Hattiesburg has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.3% in Corwith.
Demographics
Demographics Corwith vs Hattiesburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corwith | Hattiesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 52 |
| White | 94 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corwith vs Hattiesburg
- In Hattiesburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 0% in Corwith.
- Corwith has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 38% in Hattiesburg.
- In Hattiesburg, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Corwith.
- Hattiesburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Corwith.
- Both Corwith and Hattiesburg have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Corwith and Hattiesburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corwith | Hattiesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corwith vs Hattiesburg
- In Hattiesburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.6% in Corwith.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hattiesburg at 20.7% versus 18.7% in Corwith.
- Hattiesburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 18.8% in Corwith.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corwith at 22.1% compared to 12.9% in Hattiesburg.
- Hattiesburg has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 36.8% in Corwith.
- Disability percentages are higher in Corwith at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Hattiesburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corwith | Hattiesburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (7) | 0.7% (362) |
| High School Diploma | 26.8% (71) | 10.4% (5,022) |
| Less than High School | 22.3% (59) | 7.5% (3,642) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.9% (21) | 20.2% (9,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corwith vs Hattiesburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Corwith have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.7% in Hattiesburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corwith hold a high school diploma at 26.8% compared to 10.4% in Hattiesburg.
- More residents in Corwith have less than a high school education at 22.3% compared to 7.5% in Hattiesburg.
- In Hattiesburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 7.9% in Corwith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.