Demographics details for Corsicana, TX vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corsicana, TX vs Carthage, MS.
| Data | Corsicana | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,566 | 4,813 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $49,353 | $47,722 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Corsicana vs Carthage
- In Corsicana, the population is higher at 25,566, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- The median age in Carthage is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 34.6 years in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has a higher median income of $49,353 compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Corsicana at 32.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 15%, compared to 14% in Corsicana.
- The unemployment rate in Corsicana is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Corsicana vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corsicana | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 45 |
| White | 38 | 36 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 34 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Corsicana vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 17% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- The Asian population is larger in Corsicana at 1% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Corsicana at 34% compared to 18% in Carthage.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corsicana at 10% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Corsicana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corsicana | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 40.1% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corsicana vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.7% in Corsicana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Corsicana at 23.5% compared to 21.6% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 19.9% in Corsicana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corsicana at 16.8% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 40.1% in Corsicana.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Corsicana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corsicana | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.7% (957) | 3.0% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (3,633) | 16.7% (806) |
| Less than High School | 25.3% (6,461) | 16.9% (811) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (2,357) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corsicana vs Carthage
- A higher percentage of residents in Corsicana have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 3.0% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 14.2% in Corsicana.
- More residents in Corsicana have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 16.9% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 9.2% in Corsicana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.