Demographics details for Corsicana, TX vs Brighton, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corsicana, TX vs Brighton, TN.
Data | Corsicana | Brighton |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,566 | 2,881 |
Median Age | 34.6 years | 30.8 years |
Median Income | $49,353 | $76,202 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Corsicana vs Brighton
- In Corsicana, the population is higher at 25,566, compared to 2,881 in Brighton.
- Residents in Corsicana have a higher median age of 34.6 years compared to 30.8 years in Brighton.
- Brighton has a higher median income of $76,202, compared to $49,353 in Corsicana.
- In Brighton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 32.0% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Brighton.
- The unemployment rate in Corsicana is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.5% in Brighton.
Demographics
Demographics Corsicana vs Brighton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Corsicana | Brighton |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 19 |
White | 38 | 76 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 34 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corsicana vs Brighton
- In Brighton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 17% in Corsicana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brighton at 76% compared to 38% in Corsicana.
- The Asian population is larger in Corsicana at 1% compared to 0% in Brighton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Corsicana at 34% compared to 3% in Brighton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corsicana at 10% compared to 2% in Brighton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Corsicana and Brighton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Corsicana | Brighton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 12.0% |
Depression | 23.5% | 29.1% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 19.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 40.1% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corsicana vs Brighton
- In Brighton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.7% in Corsicana.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brighton at 29.1% versus 23.5% in Corsicana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Corsicana at 19.9% compared to 19.3% in Brighton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corsicana at 16.8% compared to 16.5% in Brighton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Corsicana at 40.1% compared to 39.9% in Brighton.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Corsicana and Brighton at 17.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Corsicana | Brighton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.7% (957) | 1.2% (35) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (3,633) | 18.8% (541) |
Less than High School | 25.3% (6,461) | 8.8% (253) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (2,357) | 12.2% (352) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corsicana vs Brighton
- A higher percentage of residents in Corsicana have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.2% in Brighton.
- In Brighton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 14.2% in Corsicana.
- More residents in Corsicana have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 8.8% in Brighton.
- In Brighton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 9.2% in Corsicana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.