Demographics details for Corona, CA vs Palos park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corona, CA vs Palos park, IL.
Data | Corona | Palos park |
---|---|---|
Population | 159,567 | 4,792 |
Median Age | 35.9 years | 59.5 years |
Median Income | $103,727 | $128,370 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Corona vs Palos park
- In Corona, the population is higher at 159,567, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 35.9 years in Corona.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370, compared to $103,727 in Corona.
- In Palos park, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 40.0% in Corona.
- Corona has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Palos park.
- Palos park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.1% in Corona.
Demographics
Demographics Corona vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Corona | Palos park |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 3 |
White | 21 | 88 |
Asian | 11 | 1 |
Hispanic | 48 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corona vs Palos park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Corona at 6% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Palos park at 88% compared to 21% in Corona.
- The Asian population is larger in Corona at 11% compared to 1% in Palos park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Corona at 48% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corona at 13% compared to 5% in Palos park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Corona at 1% compared to 0% in Palos park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Corona | Palos park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.4% |
Depression | 16.6% | 18.5% |
Smoking | 11.8% | 11.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 20.8% |
Obesity | 34.1% | 26.7% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corona vs Palos park
- More residents in Corona report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Palos park at 18.5% versus 16.6% in Corona.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Corona at 11.8% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 16.7% in Corona.
- Obesity rates are higher in Corona at 34.1% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Palos park at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Corona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Corona | Palos park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (3,102) | 1.1% (54) |
High School Diploma | 14.3% (22,788) | 18.2% (870) |
Less than High School | 17.4% (27,748) | 6.0% (287) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (31,335) | 42.1% (2,018) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corona vs Palos park
- A higher percentage of residents in Corona have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.1% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 14.3% in Corona.
- More residents in Corona have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 19.6% in Corona.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.