Demographics details for Corona, CA vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corona, CA vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Corona | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 159,567 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $103,727 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Corona vs Live oak
- In Corona, the population is higher at 159,567, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- The median age in Live oak is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 35.9 years in Corona.
- Corona has a higher median income of $103,727 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Corona at 40.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 11% in Corona.
- Live oak has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Corona.
Demographics
Demographics Corona vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corona | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 38 |
| White | 21 | 41 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 48 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corona vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 6% in Corona.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Live oak at 41% compared to 21% in Corona.
- The Asian population is larger in Corona at 11% compared to 0% in Live oak.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Corona at 48% compared to 9% in Live oak.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corona at 13% compared to 12% in Live oak.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Corona at 1% compared to 0% in Live oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corona | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corona vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.1% in Corona.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Live oak at 19.3% versus 16.6% in Corona.
- Live oak has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 11.8% in Corona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corona at 16.7% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Live oak has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 34.1% in Corona.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Live oak at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Corona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corona | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (3,102) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (22,788) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (27,748) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (31,335) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corona vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.9% in Corona.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 14.3% in Corona.
- More residents in Corona have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corona hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.