Demographics details for Corona, CA vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corona, CA vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Corona | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 159,567 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $103,727 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Corona vs Gallatin
- In Corona, the population is higher at 159,567, compared to 48,194 in Gallatin.
- The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 35.9 years in Corona.
- Corona has a higher median income of $103,727 compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Corona at 40.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 11% in Corona.
- The unemployment rate in Corona is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Corona vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corona | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 15 |
| White | 21 | 67 |
| Asian | 11 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 48 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corona vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 6% in Corona.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 21% in Corona.
- The Asian population is larger in Corona at 11% compared to 2% in Gallatin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Corona at 48% compared to 9% in Gallatin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corona at 13% compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Corona at 1% compared to 0% in Gallatin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corona | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corona vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.1% in Corona.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 16.6% in Corona.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 11.8% in Corona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corona at 16.7% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 34.1% in Corona.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Corona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corona | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (3,102) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (22,788) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (27,748) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (31,335) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corona vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of residents in Corona have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.2% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corona hold a high school diploma at 14.3% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- More residents in Corona have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Corona and Gallatin at 19.6%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.