Demographics details for Corona, CA vs Fort calhoun, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corona, CA vs Fort calhoun, NE.
| Data | Corona | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 159,567 | 1,115 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 44.1 years |
| Median Income | $103,727 | $75,900 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Corona vs Fort calhoun
- In Corona, the population is higher at 159,567, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
- The median age in Fort calhoun is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 35.9 years in Corona.
- Corona has a higher median income of $103,727 compared to $75,900 in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Corona and Fort calhoun at 40.0%.
- Corona has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- The unemployment rate in Corona is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics Corona vs Fort calhoun provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corona | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 1 |
| White | 21 | 85 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 48 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corona vs Fort calhoun
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Corona at 6% compared to 1% in Fort calhoun.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort calhoun at 85% compared to 21% in Corona.
- The Asian population is larger in Corona at 11% compared to 0% in Fort calhoun.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Corona at 48% compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corona at 13% compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Corona at 1% compared to 0% in Fort calhoun.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corona | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 15.3% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 22.1% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 33.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corona vs Fort calhoun
- More residents in Corona report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Depression is more prevalent in Corona at 16.6% compared to 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Fort calhoun has a higher smoking rate at 14.0% compared to 11.8% in Corona.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 16.7% in Corona.
- Obesity rates are higher in Corona at 34.1% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort calhoun at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Corona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corona | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (3,102) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (22,788) | 33.7% (376) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (27,748) | 6.5% (72) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (31,335) | 14.4% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corona vs Fort calhoun
- A higher percentage of residents in Corona have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
- In Fort calhoun, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.7% compared to 14.3% in Corona.
- More residents in Corona have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corona hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 14.4% in Fort calhoun.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.