Demographics details for Corona, CA vs Blue ridge, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corona, CA vs Blue ridge, GA.
| Data | Corona | Blue ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 159,567 | 1,226 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 47.3 years |
| Median Income | $103,727 | $34,659 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Corona vs Blue ridge
- In Corona, the population is higher at 159,567, compared to 1,226 in Blue ridge.
- The median age in Blue ridge is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 35.9 years in Corona.
- Corona has a higher median income of $103,727 compared to $34,659 in Blue ridge.
- In Blue ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 40.0% in Corona.
- The poverty level is higher in Blue ridge at 14%, compared to 11% in Corona.
- The unemployment rate in Corona is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Blue ridge.
Demographics
Demographics Corona vs Blue ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Corona | Blue ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 3 |
| White | 21 | 93 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 48 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corona vs Blue ridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Corona at 6% compared to 3% in Blue ridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Blue ridge at 93% compared to 21% in Corona.
- The Asian population is larger in Corona at 11% compared to 0% in Blue ridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Corona at 48% compared to 3% in Blue ridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corona at 13% compared to 1% in Blue ridge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Corona at 1% compared to 0% in Blue ridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Corona | Blue ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corona vs Blue ridge
- In Blue ridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.1% in Corona.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Blue ridge at 23.5% versus 16.6% in Corona.
- Blue ridge has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 11.8% in Corona.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Blue ridge at 17.3% compared to 16.7% in Corona.
- Obesity rates are higher in Corona at 34.1% compared to 32.9% in Blue ridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Blue ridge at 27.0% compared to 7.0% in Corona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Corona | Blue ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (3,102) | 3.5% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (22,788) | 21.1% (259) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (27,748) | 38.8% (476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (31,335) | 15.3% (187) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corona vs Blue ridge
- In Blue ridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 1.9% in Corona.
- In Blue ridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 14.3% in Corona.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Blue ridge at 38.8%, compared to 17.4% in Corona.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corona hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 15.3% in Blue ridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.