Demographics details for Corinth, MS vs Gloverville, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corinth, MS vs Gloverville, SC.
Data | Corinth | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,312 | 3,099 |
Median Age | 42.1 years | 31.4 years |
Median Income | $40,546 | $46,643 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Corinth vs Gloverville
- In Corinth, the population is higher at 14,312, compared to 3,099 in Gloverville.
- Residents in Corinth have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 31.4 years in Gloverville.
- Gloverville has a higher median income of $46,643, compared to $40,546 in Corinth.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Corinth at 32.0% compared to 20.0% in Gloverville.
- Corinth has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Gloverville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Corinth and Gloverville at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Corinth vs Gloverville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Corinth | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 18 |
White | 72 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corinth vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 17% in Corinth.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gloverville at 76% compared to 72% in Corinth.
- Both Corinth and Gloverville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Gloverville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Corinth.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corinth at 5% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Corinth at 1% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Corinth | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 15.8% |
Depression | 23.5% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 21.4% | 25.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corinth vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 17.5% in Corinth.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gloverville at 24.7% versus 23.5% in Corinth.
- Gloverville has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 21.4% in Corinth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gloverville at 16.1% compared to 14.7% in Corinth.
- Obesity rates are higher in Corinth at 39.5% compared to 39.3% in Gloverville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gloverville at 24.0% compared to 23.0% in Corinth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Corinth | Gloverville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (80) | 0.8% (25) |
High School Diploma | 14.4% (2,059) | 29.9% (927) |
Less than High School | 22.8% (3,266) | 19.7% (610) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.8% (2,547) | 4.3% (134) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corinth vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Corinth.
- In Gloverville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 14.4% in Corinth.
- More residents in Corinth have less than a high school education at 22.8% compared to 19.7% in Gloverville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corinth hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 4.3% in Gloverville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.