Demographics details for Cordele, GA vs Three oaks, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cordele, GA vs Three oaks, MI.
Data | Cordele | Three oaks |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,914 | 1,397 |
Median Age | 36.7 years | 40.4 years |
Median Income | $33,166 | $57,083 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Cordele vs Three oaks
- In Cordele, the population is higher at 9,914, compared to 1,397 in Three oaks.
- The median age in Three oaks is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 36.7 years in Cordele.
- Three oaks has a higher median income of $57,083, compared to $33,166 in Cordele.
- In Three oaks, the percentage of married families is higher at 27.0%, compared to 24.0% in Cordele.
- Cordele has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Three oaks.
- The unemployment rate in Cordele is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.9% in Three oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Cordele vs Three oaks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cordele | Three oaks |
---|---|---|
Black | 72 | Data is updating |
White | 26 | 52 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 26 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 21 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cordele vs Three oaks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cordele at 72% compared to 0% in Three oaks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Three oaks at 52% compared to 26% in Cordele.
- In Three oaks, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Cordele.
- Three oaks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 2% in Cordele.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Three oaks at 21%, compared to 0% in Cordele.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cordele and Three oaks at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cordele | Three oaks |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.5% | 10.8% |
Depression | 21.7% | 25.3% |
Smoking | 24.6% | 17.8% |
Binge Drinking | 11.7% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 46.6% | 35.0% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cordele vs Three oaks
- More residents in Cordele report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.0% in Three oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Three oaks at 25.3% versus 21.7% in Cordele.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cordele at 24.6% compared to 17.8% in Three oaks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Three oaks at 19.4% compared to 11.7% in Cordele.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cordele at 46.6% compared to 35.0% in Three oaks.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cordele at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Three oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cordele | Three oaks |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (61) | 1.8% (25) |
High School Diploma | 19.4% (1,923) | 16.2% (226) |
Less than High School | 17.1% (1,693) | 8.2% (114) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (866) | 12.2% (171) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cordele vs Three oaks
- In Three oaks, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Cordele.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cordele hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 16.2% in Three oaks.
- More residents in Cordele have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 8.2% in Three oaks.
- In Three oaks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 8.7% in Cordele.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.