Demographics details for Cordele, GA vs Point of rocks, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cordele, GA vs Point of rocks, MD.

Data Cordele Point of rocks
Population 9,914 2,360
Median Age 36.7 years 38.3 years
Median Income $33,166 $126,944
Married Families 24.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 20% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Cordele vs Point of rocks

  • In Cordele, the population is higher at 9,914, compared to 2,360 in Point of rocks.
  • The median age in Point of rocks is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 36.7 years in Cordele.
  • Point of rocks has a higher median income of $126,944, compared to $33,166 in Cordele.
  • In Point of rocks, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 24.0% in Cordele.
  • Cordele has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 0% in Point of rocks.
  • The unemployment rate in Cordele is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Point of rocks.

Demographics

Demographics Cordele vs Point of rocks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cordele Point of rocks
Black 72 13
White 26 57
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 2 15
Two or More Races Data is updating 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cordele vs Point of rocks

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cordele at 72% compared to 13% in Point of rocks.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Point of rocks at 57% compared to 26% in Cordele.
  • In Point of rocks, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Cordele.
  • Point of rocks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 2% in Cordele.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Point of rocks at 9%, compared to 0% in Cordele.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cordele and Point of rocks at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cordele Point of rocks
Mental Health Not Good 20.4% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 16.5% 7.6%
Depression 21.7% 19.7%
Smoking 24.6% 12.0%
Binge Drinking 11.7% 17.6%
Obesity 46.6% 31.8%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cordele vs Point of rocks

  • More residents in Cordele report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 14.4% in Point of rocks.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cordele at 21.7% compared to 19.7% in Point of rocks.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cordele at 24.6% compared to 12.0% in Point of rocks.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Point of rocks at 17.6% compared to 11.7% in Cordele.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cordele at 46.6% compared to 31.8% in Point of rocks.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cordele at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Point of rocks.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cordele Point of rocks
No Schooling 0.6% (61) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.4% (1,923) 17.3% (408)
Less than High School 17.1% (1,693) 5.0% (118)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.7% (866) 28.4% (670)

Education Levels Comparison: Cordele vs Point of rocks

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cordele have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Point of rocks.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cordele hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 17.3% in Point of rocks.
  • More residents in Cordele have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 5.0% in Point of rocks.
  • In Point of rocks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 8.7% in Cordele.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.