Demographics details for Corcoran, CA vs Riverhead, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Corcoran, CA vs Riverhead, NY.
Data | Corcoran | Riverhead |
---|---|---|
Population | 22,837 | 33,539 |
Median Age | 34.0 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $53,103 | $80,000 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 16.7 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Corcoran vs Riverhead
- The population in Riverhead is higher at 33,539, compared to 22,837 in Corcoran.
- The median age in Riverhead is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 34.0 years in Corcoran.
- Riverhead has a higher median income of $80,000, compared to $53,103 in Corcoran.
- In Riverhead, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 25.0% in Corcoran.
- Corcoran has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 7% in Riverhead.
- The unemployment rate in Corcoran is higher at 16.7%, compared to 3.3% in Riverhead.
Demographics
Demographics Corcoran vs Riverhead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Corcoran | Riverhead |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 10 |
White | -8 | 70 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 74 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 20 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Corcoran vs Riverhead
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Corcoran and Riverhead at 10%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Riverhead at 70% compared to -8% in Corcoran.
- In Riverhead, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Corcoran.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Corcoran at 74% compared to 15% in Riverhead.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Corcoran at 20% compared to 0% in Riverhead.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Corcoran at 3% compared to 0% in Riverhead.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Corcoran | Riverhead |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 17.4% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 22.0% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 40.7% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Corcoran vs Riverhead
- More residents in Corcoran report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- Depression is more prevalent in Corcoran at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Corcoran at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- Binge drinking is more common in Corcoran at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- Obesity rates are higher in Corcoran at 40.7% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- Disability percentages are higher in Corcoran at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Corcoran | Riverhead |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (343) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (3,728) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 53.2% (12,144) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.7% (612) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Corcoran vs Riverhead
- A higher percentage of residents in Corcoran have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corcoran hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- More residents in Corcoran have less than a high school education at 53.2% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- A higher percentage of residents in Corcoran hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.