Demographics details for Corcoran, CA vs Gwynedd valley, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Corcoran, CA vs Gwynedd valley, PA.

Data Corcoran Gwynedd valley
Population 22,837 1,418
Median Age 34.0 years 48.0 years
Median Income $53,103 $112,500
Married Families 25.0% 64.0%
Poverty Level 20% 3%
Unemployment Rate 16.7 4.7

Population Comparison: Corcoran vs Gwynedd valley

  • In Corcoran, the population is higher at 22,837, compared to 1,418 in Gwynedd valley.
  • The median age in Gwynedd valley is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 34.0 years in Corcoran.
  • Gwynedd valley has a higher median income of $112,500, compared to $53,103 in Corcoran.
  • In Gwynedd valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 64.0%, compared to 25.0% in Corcoran.
  • Corcoran has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 3% in Gwynedd valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Corcoran is higher at 16.7%, compared to 4.7% in Gwynedd valley.

Demographics

Demographics Corcoran vs Gwynedd valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Corcoran Gwynedd valley
Black 10 1
White -8 93
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 74 2
Two or More Races 20 1
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Corcoran vs Gwynedd valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Corcoran at 10% compared to 1% in Gwynedd valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Gwynedd valley at 93% compared to -8% in Corcoran.
  • In Gwynedd valley, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Corcoran.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Corcoran at 74% compared to 2% in Gwynedd valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Corcoran at 20% compared to 1% in Gwynedd valley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Corcoran at 3% compared to 0% in Gwynedd valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Corcoran Gwynedd valley
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 17.8% Data is updating%
Depression 17.4% Data is updating%
Smoking 22.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.5% Data is updating%
Obesity 40.7% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 9.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Corcoran vs Gwynedd valley

  • More residents in Corcoran report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Corcoran at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Corcoran at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Corcoran at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Corcoran at 40.7% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Corcoran at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Corcoran Gwynedd valley
No Schooling 1.5% (343) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.3% (3,728) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 53.2% (12,144) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.7% (612) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Corcoran vs Gwynedd valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Corcoran have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Corcoran hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • More residents in Corcoran have less than a high school education at 53.2% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Corcoran hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Gwynedd valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.