Demographics details for Coral springs, FL vs Mount union, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coral springs, FL vs Mount union, PA.
Data | Coral springs | Mount union |
---|---|---|
Population | 133,369 | 2,267 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 34.8 years |
Median Income | $87,488 | $38,382 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Coral springs vs Mount union
- In Coral springs, the population is higher at 133,369, compared to 2,267 in Mount union.
- Residents in Coral springs have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 34.8 years in Mount union.
- Coral springs has a higher median income of $87,488 compared to $38,382 in Mount union.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Coral springs at 40.0% compared to 25.0% in Mount union.
- The poverty level is higher in Mount union at 12%, compared to 9% in Coral springs.
- Mount union has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.3% in Coral springs.
Demographics
Demographics Coral springs vs Mount union provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Coral springs | Mount union |
---|---|---|
Black | 25 | 8 |
White | 25 | 87 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 29 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coral springs vs Mount union
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coral springs at 25% compared to 8% in Mount union.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount union at 87% compared to 25% in Coral springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Coral springs at 6% compared to 0% in Mount union.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coral springs at 29% compared to 1% in Mount union.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coral springs at 15% compared to 4% in Mount union.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Coral springs and Mount union at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Coral springs | Mount union |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 20.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 15.3% |
Depression | 17.1% | 25.6% |
Smoking | 15.1% | 26.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 27.3% | 43.0% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coral springs vs Mount union
- In Mount union, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 14.9% in Coral springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount union at 25.6% versus 17.1% in Coral springs.
- Mount union has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 15.1% in Coral springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mount union at 16.4% compared to 15.4% in Coral springs.
- Mount union has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 27.3% in Coral springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mount union at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Coral springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Coral springs | Mount union |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (1,208) | 1.9% (43) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (18,441) | 28.5% (646) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (8,208) | 16.3% (370) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.6% (34,184) | 6.3% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coral springs vs Mount union
- In Mount union, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.9% in Coral springs.
- In Mount union, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.5% compared to 13.8% in Coral springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mount union at 16.3%, compared to 6.2% in Coral springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coral springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 6.3% in Mount union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.