Demographics details for Coral gables, FL vs Clinton, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Coral gables, FL vs Clinton, SC.
| Data | Coral gables | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,193 | 7,554 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $118,203 | $38,350 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Coral gables vs Clinton
- In Coral gables, the population is higher at 49,193, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- Residents in Coral gables have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Coral gables has a higher median income of $118,203 compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Coral gables at 39.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Clinton at 18%, compared to 6% in Coral gables.
- Clinton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.7% in Coral gables.
Demographics
Demographics Coral gables vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Coral gables | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 38 |
| White | 6 | 55 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 58 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 28 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Coral gables vs Clinton
- In Clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 4% in Coral gables.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clinton at 55% compared to 6% in Coral gables.
- The Asian population is larger in Coral gables at 4% compared to 2% in Clinton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Coral gables at 58% compared to 1% in Clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Coral gables at 28% compared to 4% in Clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Coral gables and Clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Coral gables | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 14.6% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 23.8% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Coral gables vs Clinton
- In Clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 13.0% in Coral gables.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clinton at 23.7% versus 14.6% in Coral gables.
- Clinton has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 9.4% in Coral gables.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clinton at 15.8% compared to 15.5% in Coral gables.
- Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 23.8% in Coral gables.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Coral gables.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Coral gables | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (195) | 1.0% (74) |
| High School Diploma | 5.4% (2,681) | 19.3% (1,460) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (1,890) | 15.6% (1,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.6% (22,440) | 17.3% (1,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Coral gables vs Clinton
- In Clinton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Coral gables.
- In Clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 5.4% in Coral gables.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clinton at 15.6%, compared to 3.8% in Coral gables.
- A higher percentage of residents in Coral gables hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.6% compared to 17.3% in Clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.