Demographics details for Copperas cove, TX vs Interlachen, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Copperas cove, TX vs Interlachen, FL.

Data Copperas cove Interlachen
Population 37,964 1,457
Median Age 31.7 years 48.6 years
Median Income $64,798 $50,776
Married Families 38.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 4.5

Population Comparison: Copperas cove vs Interlachen

  • In Copperas cove, the population is higher at 37,964, compared to 1,457 in Interlachen.
  • The median age in Interlachen is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 31.7 years in Copperas cove.
  • Copperas cove has a higher median income of $64,798 compared to $50,776 in Interlachen.
  • In Interlachen, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 38.0% in Copperas cove.
  • The poverty level is higher in Interlachen at 12%, compared to 11% in Copperas cove.
  • The unemployment rate in Copperas cove is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.5% in Interlachen.

Demographics

Demographics Copperas cove vs Interlachen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Copperas cove Interlachen
Black 15 11
White 47 37
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 34
Two or More Races 17 18
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Copperas cove vs Interlachen

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Copperas cove at 15% compared to 11% in Interlachen.
  • Copperas cove has a higher percentage of White residents at 47% compared to 37% in Interlachen.
  • The Asian population is larger in Copperas cove at 2% compared to 0% in Interlachen.
  • Interlachen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 19% in Copperas cove.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Interlachen at 18%, compared to 17% in Copperas cove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Copperas cove and Interlachen at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Copperas cove Interlachen
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 13.9%
Depression 24.9% 20.3%
Smoking 18.3% 24.5%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 16.7%
Obesity 41.6% 35.5%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Copperas cove vs Interlachen

  • In Interlachen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Copperas cove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Copperas cove at 24.9% compared to 20.3% in Interlachen.
  • Interlachen has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 18.3% in Copperas cove.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Copperas cove at 17.8% compared to 16.7% in Interlachen.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Copperas cove at 41.6% compared to 35.5% in Interlachen.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Interlachen at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Copperas cove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Copperas cove Interlachen
No Schooling 0.5% (200) 2.0% (29)
High School Diploma 12.8% (4,867) 22.0% (320)
Less than High School 6.8% (2,567) 41.7% (607)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.5% (4,756) 10.4% (151)

Education Levels Comparison: Copperas cove vs Interlachen

  • In Interlachen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.5% in Copperas cove.
  • In Interlachen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 12.8% in Copperas cove.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Interlachen at 41.7%, compared to 6.8% in Copperas cove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Copperas cove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 10.4% in Interlachen.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.