Demographics details for Copperas cove, TX vs Heppner, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Copperas cove, TX vs Heppner, OR.
| Data | Copperas cove | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,964 | 1,172 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $64,798 | $46,708 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Copperas cove vs Heppner
- In Copperas cove, the population is higher at 37,964, compared to 1,172 in Heppner.
- The median age in Heppner is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 31.7 years in Copperas cove.
- Copperas cove has a higher median income of $64,798 compared to $46,708 in Heppner.
- In Heppner, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Copperas cove.
- Copperas cove has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Heppner.
- Heppner has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.8% in Copperas cove.
Demographics
Demographics Copperas cove vs Heppner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Copperas cove | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 47 | 86 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Copperas cove vs Heppner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Copperas cove at 15% compared to 1% in Heppner.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Heppner at 86% compared to 47% in Copperas cove.
- The Asian population is larger in Copperas cove at 2% compared to 0% in Heppner.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Copperas cove at 19% compared to 6% in Heppner.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Copperas cove at 17% compared to 7% in Heppner.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Copperas cove and Heppner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Copperas cove | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 35.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Copperas cove vs Heppner
- In Heppner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.6% in Copperas cove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Heppner at 27.6% versus 24.9% in Copperas cove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Copperas cove at 18.3% compared to 16.2% in Heppner.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Heppner at 18.2% compared to 17.8% in Copperas cove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Copperas cove at 41.6% compared to 34.4% in Heppner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Heppner at 35.0% compared to 16.0% in Copperas cove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Copperas cove | Heppner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (200) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (4,867) | 22.0% (258) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (2,567) | 9.4% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (4,756) | 9.8% (115) |
Education Levels Comparison: Copperas cove vs Heppner
- A higher percentage of residents in Copperas cove have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Heppner.
- In Heppner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 12.8% in Copperas cove.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heppner at 9.4%, compared to 6.8% in Copperas cove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Copperas cove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 9.8% in Heppner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.