Demographics details for Copperas cove, TX vs Fresno, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Copperas cove, TX vs Fresno, CA.
| Data | Copperas cove | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,964 | 545,567 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $64,798 | $63,001 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 6.6 |
Population Comparison: Copperas cove vs Fresno
- The population in Fresno is higher at 545,567, compared to 37,964 in Copperas cove.
- The median age in Fresno is higher at 32.1 years, compared to 31.7 years in Copperas cove.
- Copperas cove has a higher median income of $64,798 compared to $63,001 in Fresno.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Copperas cove at 38.0% compared to 30.0% in Fresno.
- The poverty level is higher in Fresno at 20%, compared to 11% in Copperas cove.
- Fresno has a higher unemployment rate at 6.6% compared to 4.8% in Copperas cove.
Demographics
Demographics Copperas cove vs Fresno provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Copperas cove | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 7 |
| White | 47 | 10 |
| Asian | 2 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Copperas cove vs Fresno
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Copperas cove at 15% compared to 7% in Fresno.
- Copperas cove has a higher percentage of White residents at 47% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- In Fresno, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 2% in Copperas cove.
- Fresno has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 19% in Copperas cove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fresno at 18%, compared to 17% in Copperas cove.
- In Fresno, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Copperas cove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Copperas cove | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Copperas cove vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.6% in Copperas cove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Copperas cove at 24.9% compared to 17.6% in Fresno.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Copperas cove at 18.3% compared to 15.5% in Fresno.
- Binge drinking is more common in Copperas cove at 17.8% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- Obesity rates are higher in Copperas cove at 41.6% compared to 37.3% in Fresno.
- Disability percentages are higher in Copperas cove at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Fresno.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Copperas cove | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (200) | 2.8% (15,183) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (4,867) | 11.6% (63,519) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (2,567) | 22.1% (120,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (4,756) | 14.9% (81,421) |
Education Levels Comparison: Copperas cove vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.5% in Copperas cove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Copperas cove hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fresno at 22.1%, compared to 6.8% in Copperas cove.
- In Fresno, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 12.5% in Copperas cove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.