Demographics details for Conyers, GA vs Spartanburg, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Conyers, GA vs Spartanburg, SC.
Data | Conyers | Spartanburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,926 | 38,584 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 35.5 years |
Median Income | $53,500 | $49,140 |
Married Families | 21.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Conyers vs Spartanburg
- The population in Spartanburg is higher at 38,584, compared to 17,926 in Conyers.
- Residents in Conyers have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 35.5 years in Spartanburg.
- Conyers has a higher median income of $53,500 compared to $49,140 in Spartanburg.
- In Spartanburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 21.0% in Conyers.
- The poverty level is higher in Spartanburg at 15%, compared to 14% in Conyers.
- Spartanburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.2% in Conyers.
Demographics
Demographics Conyers vs Spartanburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Conyers | Spartanburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 62 | 45 |
White | 22 | 44 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 10 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Conyers vs Spartanburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Conyers at 62% compared to 45% in Spartanburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spartanburg at 44% compared to 22% in Conyers.
- Both Conyers and Spartanburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Conyers at 10% compared to 5% in Spartanburg.
- Both Conyers and Spartanburg have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Conyers and Spartanburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Conyers | Spartanburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 13.2% |
Depression | 20.1% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 19.4% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 42.8% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Conyers vs Spartanburg
- In Spartanburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.2% in Conyers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spartanburg at 22.9% versus 20.1% in Conyers.
- Spartanburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 19.4% in Conyers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spartanburg at 13.8% compared to 12.8% in Conyers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Conyers at 42.8% compared to 38.5% in Spartanburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spartanburg at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Conyers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Conyers | Spartanburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (204) | 1.0% (384) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (2,660) | 15.9% (6,118) |
Less than High School | 12.1% (2,169) | 11.2% (4,339) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,117) | 21.3% (8,205) |
Education Levels Comparison: Conyers vs Spartanburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Conyers have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Spartanburg.
- In Spartanburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.9% compared to 14.8% in Conyers.
- More residents in Conyers have less than a high school education at 12.1% compared to 11.2% in Spartanburg.
- In Spartanburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 17.4% in Conyers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.