Demographics details for Conyers, GA vs San marcos, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Conyers, GA vs San marcos, CA.
| Data | Conyers | San marcos |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,926 | 94,854 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $53,500 | $99,413 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Conyers vs San marcos
- The population in San marcos is higher at 94,854, compared to 17,926 in Conyers.
- Residents in Conyers have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 35.9 years in San marcos.
- San marcos has a higher median income of $99,413, compared to $53,500 in Conyers.
- In San marcos, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 21.0% in Conyers.
- Conyers has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in San marcos.
- San marcos has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.2% in Conyers.
Demographics
Demographics Conyers vs San marcos provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Conyers | San marcos |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | 2 |
| White | 22 | 31 |
| Asian | 2 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 40 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Conyers vs San marcos
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Conyers at 62% compared to 2% in San marcos.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in San marcos at 31% compared to 22% in Conyers.
- In San marcos, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 2% in Conyers.
- San marcos has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 10% in Conyers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San marcos at 16%, compared to 4% in Conyers.
- In San marcos, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Conyers.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Conyers | San marcos |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 11.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 42.8% | 24.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Conyers vs San marcos
- More residents in Conyers report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.9% in San marcos.
- Depression is more prevalent in Conyers at 20.1% compared to 17.8% in San marcos.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Conyers at 19.4% compared to 11.2% in San marcos.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San marcos at 18.6% compared to 12.8% in Conyers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Conyers at 42.8% compared to 24.2% in San marcos.
- Disability percentages are higher in Conyers at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in San marcos.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Conyers | San marcos |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (204) | 1.8% (1,684) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (2,660) | 10.1% (9,567) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (2,169) | 15.0% (14,213) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,117) | 26.4% (25,049) |
Education Levels Comparison: Conyers vs San marcos
- In San marcos, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.1% in Conyers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Conyers hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 10.1% in San marcos.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San marcos at 15.0%, compared to 12.1% in Conyers.
- In San marcos, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 17.4% in Conyers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.